

Upwip
Feedback only earns its keep when it changes what you build next. Upwip turns scattered requests into a ranked, public board where users vote and a roadmap plus changelog show them their input actually shipped. One workspace covers a product; five cover a whole agency.
Customer feedback rarely arrives in one tidy place. It shows up in support tickets, Slack DMs, the occasional angry tweet, and emails you keep meaning to get to. Upwip pulls those scattered signals onto a single board, so you can see what people actually want before you build the wrong thing.
What Upwip actually does
At its core it is a place to collect, rank, and act on what your users tell you. The feature set leans toward closing the loop rather than just logging complaints:
- Centralize feature requests, bug reports, and product ideas from multiple channels
- Rank requests by votes and engagement so the loudest demand surfaces first
- Publish a public roadmap showing what is planned, in progress, and shipped
- Tie feedback to roadmap items and changelog entries so users watch their input land
- Announce new features and fixes through a built-in changelog
- Build a self-service knowledge base to cut repetitive support questions
- Answer visitors in real time with a live chat widget
- Run separate workspaces for each product or agency client
The piece that earns its place is the loop. Collecting feedback is the easy part, and plenty of tools stop there. Upwip's bet is that people keep giving you signal only when they see it go somewhere, so the roadmap and changelog stay wired back to the original requests. Someone who asked for a feature gets to watch it move from under review to shipped, which is the whole difference between a suggestion box and a conversation.
How it fits in your stack
Plenty of teams run their roadmap out of a Notion page and a pinned Slack thread. That holds up until the volume grows and nobody can tell which request has ten votes versus one. Upwip positions itself as the structured replacement for that improvised setup: a public board your users can actually vote on, instead of a doc only your own team ever opens. The knowledge base and live chat sit alongside it, so the same place that gathers requests also fields the questions that would otherwise become more tickets.
Who it's built for
This fits small product teams and solo founders who are past the spreadsheet stage and want users to see that feedback goes somewhere. Agencies and freelancers juggling several clients get the clearest win, since each product or client lives in its own workspace without the boards bleeding into each other. If you have ever lost a good feature request in a chat thread, the pull here is obvious.
Entry pricing starts at $79 for a single workspace with the full board, roadmap, changelog, blog, and documentation set. Managing more than one product bumps you to five workspaces and adds the live chat widget and a status page. Worth a look if you have been meaning to give feedback a real home rather than another inbox you forget to check.
Trust Score
Coming soonWe're building a transparent Trust Score that grades every deal on developer activity, update frequency, support, refund policy, and uptime. It's not live yet — see how it will work.
Reviews
Alternatives




Your Google Sheets already run half your business. Stackby is the upgrade that keeps the grid you know but adds linked records, filtered views, dashboards, and automations behind it. Pay once for the codes and scale by stacking them instead of climbing a per-seat pricing curve every quarter.
Affiliate link · we earn a small commission if you buy